Culture and Society of the Arab World
“Keeping Connected: A Comparative Analysis of Transmigration and Habitus” (2012)
Abstract: Labor migration has been the subject of vast academic literature in the past
twenty years as researchers have been tempted to measure its extent, to define its dominant
characteristics, and particularly to evaluate its contribution to economic and social development.
Migration (including internal, external, immigration, etc.) occurs over any distance and in
various group sizes. Individuals (and groups) may choose to migrate for a number of reasons.
Therefore, anthropologists must examine several important aspects of immigration and
resettlement, such as the push/pull factors. Push factors are reasons for emigrating because
of a difficulty: food shortage, war, environmental disaster, etc. Pull factors are reasons for
immigrating, because of something desirable: economic factors, increased political or religious
freedom, etc. Several types of push and pull factors may influence migrants in their movements
- often at the same time. The outcome of migration frequently results in the social phenomena
and relation which transcends nation states, called transmigration. The term “transmigrants” has
been coined to refer to immigrants who maintain close relations with their home countries. In
this paper, I will be using two stories of transmigrants - one male and one female - both of whom
have the same end goal, which is to make enough money abroad for their families to renovate
their apartments back home in order to raise their (and their families’) social status. Magdy (the
subject of Farha Ghannam’s Keeping Him Connected: Labor Migration and the Production of
Locality in Cairo) is an Egyptian national working for a publishing company in Kuwait. Gloria
(whose story is an excerpt from Pardis Mahdavi’s Gridlock: Labor, Migration, and Human
Trafficking in Dubai) is a Filipina who was recruited as a domestic worker in Dubai, and then
switches to the informal sex work sector to make more money. By so doing, Gloria configures
a livelihood strategy, piecing together opportunities in her receiving country to reap the greatest
rewards, as is typical of transmigrants. Although Magdy and Gloria have the same objective,
the ways they go about achieving their goals are varied, illustrating the complexity of migration.
After briefly outlining my definitions and contextual background, I will ground the comparison
in Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of habitus, to better explain how/why Magdy and Gloria go to such
lengths to fulfill their families’ and societies’ expectations. Once I have thoroughly explained
my framework, I will describe the stories, motives and outcomes of/for Magdy and Gloria, and
finally compare them before drawing my conclusions.